Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States, Rooker–Feldman doctrine, Concurrent jurisdiction, ExxonMobil, SABIC
978-620-0-12701-3
6200127018
152
2011-12-24
49.00 €
eng
https://images.our-assets.com/cover/230x230/9786200127013.jpg
https://images.our-assets.com/fullcover/230x230/9786200127013.jpg
https://images.our-assets.com/cover/2000x/9786200127013.jpg
https://images.our-assets.com/fullcover/2000x/9786200127013.jpg
Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280 (2005), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and its relation to preclusion and concurrent jurisdiction. In 1980, two subsidiaries of Exxon Mobil Corporation (the plaintiff and petitioner in this matter) formed a joint venture with defendant/respondent Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC). Twenty years later, a dispute arose over royalties SABIC had charged Exxon Mobil's subsidiaries for sublicenses to a polyethylene manufacturing method, and SABIC sued the two subsidiaries in Delaware Superior Court in July 2000.
https://www.morebooks.de/books/ru/published_by/lect-publishing/189870/products
Право, Занятость, Финансы
https://www.morebooks.de/store/ru/book/exxon-mobil-corp-v-saudi-basic-industries-corp/isbn/978-620-0-12701-3